|

Dr. Qin Xiao, Chairman,
China Merchants Bank
China, like
much of the world, is breathing a sigh of relief that economic
disaster has been averted. Better than expected macro economic data
are driving growing optimism.
But
government officials and businessmen should not delude themselves.
Going back to pre crisis ways would be a serious mistake. We still
have an unbalanced global economy.
US consumers
consume too much and save too little.
Chinese consumers prefer to save. Premier Wen said last month that
our recovery “is not steady, solid and balanced.”
Privatization of China’s housing market has contributed to the
development of consumers, and urbanization of 20m a year powers
consumption. But, I am not satisfied with the process We need to
establish a credible national safety net.
Stock and
property bubbles are dangerous.
Compared
with pouring money into the economy, draining money from the economy
is a much tougher job for central banks.
The dilemma is that if we tighten monetary policy, there could be a
“second dip” next year and another asset bubble occur.
I do not believe quick fiscal stimuli are good for China.
We should
not fear a moderate slowdown.
China must
shift from loose money to neutral.
There is growing concern
that temporary stimuli evolve into permanent government control of
the economy. The Chinese government should continue to loosen its
grip. Prices, especially of energy but including water and food,
need to be freed further. The currency needs to be liberalized.
Privatization needs to move ahead. China needs freer markets, not
more state control.
Finally, protectionism is a worry. Recent actions are small in terms
of the value of the goods involved.
But even
imposing symbolic protectionist measures to keep domestic interests
happy is a dangerous strategy.
Both the US and China must resist domestic pressures to restrict
trade or risk igniting a wider trade war.
Protectionism poses real threats to the global economy and we must
be sensitive to changes in US trade policy, as US policies will
largely define the future of globalization.

|