|
By now,
everyone no doubt realizes that I am not a fan of the pace at which
the federal government has worked to contain the oil spill in the
Gulf of Mexico. Sadly, federal officials were slow to act and overly
bureaucratic. They have never really understood the urgency of the
situation down here. I'm not raising a question of motive; it's
simply a function of the federal government being a slow-moving
albatross. The only way to attack a crisis like this is with the
urgency of a military mind-set.
Even after the well is finally capped, the damage done to our
environment, to the Gulf of Mexico, and to our marshes, wetlands and
beaches will take years to repair. There is another type of damage
from this spill: its human impact. Thousands of lives, businesses
and families are reeling.
Against this backdrop, the federal government unwisely chose to add
insult to injury by decreeing a moratorium on deepwater drilling in
the gulf. This ill-advised and ill-considered moratorium, which a
federal judge called "arbitrary" and "capricious," creates a second
disaster for our economy, throwing thousands of hardworking folks
out of their jobs and causing real damage to many families. Now this
federal policy risks killing 20,000 more jobs and will result in a
loss of $65 million to $135 million in wages each month.
To ensure that such a disaster does not happen again, should the
federal government increase oversight, or require additional and
better equipment or on-site federal inspectors, or even temporarily
pause drilling at specific rigs for additional reviews? Of course.
Could it? Of course. But by simply stopping all deepwater drilling,
federal officials appear more interested in ideology and scoring
political points -- as they have done with the misguided
cap-and-trade legislation -- at the expense of Americans who derive
their livelihood from the energy industry.
Let's be clear: This moratorium will do nothing to clean up the Gulf
of Mexico, and it is already doing great harm to many hardworking
citizens. The effects will extend well beyond Louisiana. Since the
moratorium was announced, America has already lost two rigs to
foreign countries. More drilling companies are negotiating right now
to work elsewhere. Every time we decrease our level of production,
we make America more dependent on foreign sources of energy.
On those few occasions when our country suffers a commercial airline
tragedy, we do not respond by stopping all air travel for six
months. Rather, we get to work figuring out the root cause and set
about trying to make air travel safer. We don't grind everything to
a halt and put tens of thousands of people out of work, jeopardizing
our economy.
So, my state joined a lawsuit against the moratorium. We pointed out
that a majority of the experts the federal government consulted
before the ban, including representatives from the National Academy
of Engineering, have stated publicly that they do not agree with the
six-month blanket moratorium.
The court sided with the people of Louisiana in this matter.
Consider the judge's statements: that the federal moratorium would
result in the loss of jobs and livelihoods, that the government's
action "does not seem to be fact-specific" and that the
"government's hair-splitting explanation abuses reason and common
sense."
One might assume that the federal government would back down, lift
the moratorium and get on with the business of ensuring that nothing
like this ever happens again in federal waters.
Nope.
Our federal government chose to fight on in court, and lost a second
time.
Surely now, many of us thought, the federal government would stop
its efforts to halt all drilling and instead get serious about more
rigorous oversight and inspections.
Nope.
Instead, the federal government drafted a new moratorium. This seems
to be a cynical ploy. It will take time to again take federal
officials to court. If Washington loses, officials can issue a third
moratorium and play this game out as long as they want. Such is the
power of the federal government.
Louisianans, of all people, don't want to see another drop of oil
spilled into the Gulf of Mexico.
It is our
land and our way of life that are being harmed. Yet the
administration tells our people to simply file a claim with BP or
file for unemployment. Our people want to work, not collect
unemployment checks.
We don't want to see the federal government create a second
disaster, an economic disaster, for the people of our state thanks
to its "capricious" and "arbitrary" actions. The bottom line is
this: Thousands of Louisianans shouldn't have to lose their jobs
just because the federal government can't do its job.
|